Tuesday, December 1, 2009

What I Learned About Theater from Restaurant School

Hello economic revitalizers! Looks like I’ve mimicked Jon’s learn-and-tell format. This is Connie from Conni’s Avant Garde Restaurant, an actor-run ensemble theater company. We create live episodic performances about a fictional ensemble theater company that runs a fictional restaurant. But, the food is real. The actors themselves make the meals from scratch, and we serve family-style to the audience seated at communal banquet tables. (Read about how we create our menus on The Jew and the Carrot.)


Last year, with concurrent project support from the ERPA program and a scholarship from Women Chefs and Restaurateurs I was able to attend the Culinary Management Program at the Institute of Culinary Education. I like to think of it as a form of extreme dramaturgy for my role in the show as restaurant manager. I went hoping to apply the for-profit business model of a restaurant to our artist-driven theater company. Sounds simple enough, right? With some time to reflect, here’s what I learned about theater from restaurant school:



Lesson #1: Our problems are not unique.

The class met three times a week. Two out of three classes were taught by Vin McCann, former VP of Boulder Creek Steakhouse Group and current owner/operator of the Wells House in the Adirondacks. Vin’s favorite thing to say was, “The restaurant business is a disease.” By this, he meant that it was a risky, labor-intensive, heavily-regulated, low-margin, business with a high burnout factor, and that the only reason to do it is if you just can’t help it. Sound familiar?


Like theaters, restaurants have limited seating and face the problem of limited distribution. Each restaurant has an optimum sales volume given the seating capacity and the service style of the house. This is the point when sales plateau because you cannot turn tables faster or raise prices further without losing customers. The only remaining course to increase profitability is to control food and labor costs. We were quizzed on this concept, with the bonus question “What is the optimal cost of labor percentage?” The answer was supposed to be as little as possible, but I wanted pay my ensemble members as much as possible. I answered the question wrong on purpose.


Because of this inherent limitation, restaurants have a lifecycle. It averages about seven years. After that, a new restaurant needs to open in order for the business to keep growing. Pause. I wanted to strengthen and give longevity to our existing group, not grow for the sake of growth.


Vin’s second favorite thing to say was “We are not artists.”



Lesson #2: We are not artists.

Our class represented the most diverse collection of oddballs (geographic, economic, cultural, education level, age, you name it) that you could possibly put in a room together. But we all wanted to open a restaurant. One classmate, a Bahamian former bar owner, wanted to provide for the public what her grandmother provided for her family. By piling the table high with good eats and offering a warm welcome, she could give people the feeling that they had enough. For the fabulous club kid from Vegas who was getting a restaurant for his 21st birthday present, it was the promise of a glitzy design all his own and the spectacle of tall food served by runway models. For the Korean who wanted to open a fried chicken shop, it was an essential philosophical response to life: Since the one thing human beings have to do in order to stay alive is eat, you should do that one thing well. Most of my classmates had a strong vision and felt personally compelled to do their work despite many practical incentives not to.


But we are not artists?


No, because we have to serve the diners (aka audience). It doesn’t matter if a genius chef knows that a certain combination will make a better dish if no one will eat it. It doesn’t matter if we like red when the customer wants white. Above all, we cannot fall in love with an idea. We have to be willing let it go, fast, and re-coup our losses if it just isn’t working. We are not creating something for our own self-expression.


I wondered if maybe artists couldn’t afford to be artists anymore either.



Lesson #3: The best restaurateurs are stage magicians.

The third class each week was taught by Steve Zagor, the director of the program and former manager of Shelly Fireman’s Trattoria dell’ Arte. He was a not-so-closeted theater geek, who liked to try out his different accents on the class and erupt into spontaneous role-play situations in which you were obliged to participate. Steve’s favorite thing to do was give examples of extreme hospitality, and to point out situations where, with no extra cost, you could impress your guests with how much you care that they have a great time.


Like theaters, restaurants provide a live, subjective, temporal, experience.


The best restaurateurs know that the product they are selling is theater and not food. Customers rarely complain about the food, and most often comment about the service. External marketing and advertising is most effective in bringing in initial business and first-time customers. After that, it is all about internal marketing intended to bring in repeat business. A great meal (aka play?) doesn’t always make a great story. Complainers are powerful, and customers remember and repeat the worst experiences because they make the best stories. But when the manager notices you don’t have an umbrella and goes out of his or her way to surprise you with a complimentary one, you will repeat that story. Personal attention also makes for good stories.


We had to write service scripts for what a customer should experience from the moment they made a reservation to the moment they walked out the door. Are there good signtlines? Is the chaos of back-of-house operations concealed from front-of-house? How does the menu (aka program) orient you to the experience? What does the place smell like? (There is a whole industry of manufacturing scents to impact consumer behavior: Ladies, this holiday season, watch out if you detect vanilla being pumped through the vents. It makes you buy more.) How is the table set? How is the server trained to reply when asked for extra lemon? Are the bathrooms clean? Does someone say goodbye? Do you send a thank-you-for-coming email?


All of this script-writing is called “four-walls marketing”. The term makes me as squirmy as “audience development” or “donor cultivation”, with its connotation that money is always an underlying ulterior motive for kindness or consideration.


Where is the sincerity in this? See Lesson #4.



Lesson #4: Compensation is not the most important key to retaining staff. Or, the reason to go into the restaurant business is to have fun.

The most important person to keep happy in a restaurant is the dishwasher. The seamless operation depends completely on him or her, and he or she is generally the lowest paid worker. Restaurant workers tend to be either unskilled low-wage workers or those with career aspirations in other industries. Many actors, not coincidentally, are waiters.


More than compensation, the statistics show that the most important factor in retaining staff is a positive work environment. People like to feel like they are a part of something that matters, like they are empowered to solve problems, like they are hosts rather than servants. Happy staff create a welcoming environment for the customer and are key to the longevity and success of the restaurant.



Lesson #5: People are willing to pay for theater!

No one knows the real price of a theater ticket in the not-for-profit sector. Tickets are so heavily subsidized by contributed income that audiences have no idea what it should actually cost. Restaurants have done a much better job of relaying this information. A word of advice from their industry to ours: Never offer discounts. It is a slippery slope that causes people to devalue the experience.


People pay for theater every time they go out to eat. Consider the theater of the New York City hamburger. A hamburger that costs the same amount to make ranges widely in price depending on the venue. I gladly pay twice as much for a hamburger on an interesting geometric plate with nice lighting accompanied by soft music than a hamburger in a dive bar. And I still think that’s what it costs.


In a restaurant that is doing great, food costs account for 25-35% of sales. The difference between the cost and the price is the margin. This margin is why I haven’t given up on this pricing experiment yet. Conni’s Avant Garde Restaurant seeks to price our theater tickets at four times the food and beverage cost. The payment for the theater is in the margin, and it is more than we are used to getting from ticket sales. I strongly believe that we theater artists are uniquely qualified to create live experiences that are more memorable and transformative than any restaurant. We just haven’t taught people how to pay for it yet.



DISCUSSION QUESTIONS!

Lesson #1: Should theaters have a lifecycle?

Lesson #2: Does a theater artist have a bigger responsibility to him/herself or to the community?

Lesson #3: Assignment: Write a script for what an audience member experiences at your theatrical event. Hint: It starts before and continues after they are seated for the play.

Lesson #4: How important is it to sustainability that actors in a production have a voice?

Lesson #5: What tangible thing besides food could you offer to audiences as a basis for ticket pricing?


www.avantgarderestaurant.com

Friday, November 20, 2009

What a year of market research didn't teach me

Jon from Stolen Chair here. We are just two short days away from launching the country's first Community Supported Theatre (CST). While we had initially intended to make the launch event the first members-only gathering, earlier this week, we decided to open it to the public (don't miss it!), just the latest refinement we've been encourage to make in our thinking since the CST opened for sign-ups Nov 1. Before that opening, we had spent 14 months preparing, conducting extensive market research, or at least the most extensive market research that a small non-profit theatre company can conduct. Nevertheless, in the three weeks since the website went live and the brochures got distributed, I can't imagine experiencing a steeper learning curve. Here are three things we learned, boiled down to some simple axioms:
  • Teach: It takes most people a long time to understand what the CST actually is. Once people get it, we've had universally positive reactions, but it's not as simple as "You like chocolate and you like peanutbutter. How 'bout trying one of these here new-fangled Reeses Peanutbutter Cups?" We've had to learn to approach this introduction in much the same way a teacher plans a lesson, breaking down step by step goals for each successive impression so that the consumer gets the complete picture without being overwhelmed by details. This means, however, that, like any good teacher, we need to know our audience well enough to tailor our approach to each "learning style."
  • Listen: Though the ERPA process gave us plenty of time and support to finalize the terms of membership in the CST, in the 3 weeks since sign-ups opened, our consumers have asked for 4 different ways to CST. Though we might never have thought to add these ourselves, interested consumers can now (1) join via an installment plan, for those who have difficulty paying the year's fee up front (2) purchase a membership as a unique, experiential gift for someone else (3) offer the CST as a perk for up to 10 employees and (4) access all of our online community building even if they live outside of the NYC metro area and cannot attend events.
  • Talk: Though we're still waiting for that New York Times profile on the CST (come on NYT, where are you on this? You could write about the country's first Community Supported Theatre or trace the evolving facial hair habits of Billyburg Hipsters...which did you write about?!), we have received some great press for the launch and a whole lotta buzz on Twitter and the blogosphere. None of this came through traditional publicity channels (press releases, eblasts, etc), though. All of it emerged organically through conversations I had with artists and social innovators who were already talking about similar ideas. As we learn time and time again in the world of PR, pulling people into your orbit always works better than pushing your news.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Community Supported Theater goes BIG!!

It's allover twitter apparently and getting national press left and right. I love it.

Here's the nytheatre.com podcast that we taped last weekend with the incredibly supportive Martin and Rochelle Denton.

And a Chronicle of Philanthropy piece is coming out on Wednesday.

And one of my faves, Andrew Taylor, blogged it last week.

And finally? Watch Jon Stancato of Stolen Chair at The Field's WNYC Event on September 21st talking about the CST.

ERPA Clip 5 Jon Stancato/Stolen Chair Theatre Company from The Field on Vimeo.


They haven't even officially launched the CST yet but any second now!! Get on the goods and become a part of the first CST.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Who likes you?

There is so much to learn from the music business!!

NPR did a brilliant one hour On the Media on sampling, girl talk, making $, and fans. I love what Amanda Palmer of Dresden Dolls has to say about selling tshirts ($11,000 via Twitter in 2 hours when she was bored?). And this Band Metrics thing? delineates single-users, fans, and supporters? Helps us understand the full spectrum of who likes us and why.....(Band Metrics beta site is down it seems but stay tuned!)

And here's our own Nick Brooke, music sampler extraordinaire, at WNYC explaining how he is using music samples to raise some dough, build his fan base, and create his next show.

ERPA Clip 4 Nick Brooke from The Field on Vimeo.

Monday, October 19, 2009

The Field Awards $55,000 to Artists!!!

Economic Revitalization for Performing Artists (ERPA) asked, "How can artists make new money for their work?" ERPA challenged artists to propose inventive, replicable, and sustainable models to help revitalize the creative economy.

After more than a year of entrepreneurial investigations, seven ERPA projects were adjudicated by a panel of veteran arts and business leaders to receive up to $20,000 in funds from The Field. The results are in...

Implementation Awards provide grants of $10,000 to $20,000 to continue developing and implementing each project under the auspices of The Field. Awardees: Connie Hall/ Conni's Avant Garde Restaurant, JoAnna Mendl Shaw/ The Equus Projects, Jon Stancato/ Stolen Chair Theatre Company, Caroline Woolard/ Our Goods

Replicability Awards offer stipends of $1,500 with additional professional development support from The Field, intended to help document and communicate each project's findings to the greater artistic community. Awardees: Kahlil Almustafa, Nick Brooke, Rachel Chavkin/The TEAM

View the full Press Release!

Monday, September 21, 2009

Public Display of Invention

Stream Full Audio Coverage:








Download Audio File

Public Display of Invention
Monday, September 21, 7:30-9:30pm
WNYC's The Greene Space

seven unique visions to catalyze and sustain the cultural economy

Presented as part of The Field’s Economic Revitalization for Performing Artists program (ERPA -pronounced ur·pah) made possible by the NYC Cultural Innovation Fund of The Rockefeller Foundation.

ERPA asked “How can artists make new money for their work?” And then ERPA challenged artists to propose inventive, sustainable and replicable models to do this.

Presenters: Kahlil Almustafa, Rachel Chavkin / The T.E.A.M., Nick Brooke, Jon Stancato / Stolen Chair, Connie Hall / Conni's Avant Garde Restaurant, JoAnna Mendl Shaw / The Equus Projects, and Caroline Woolard / Our Goods.

In November 2008, 116 artists and companies applied to The Field’s grassroots search for new economic models. Seven artists with the most feasible, sustainable, innovative and replicable models were selected. Since then, the ERPA 7 as we affectionately call them, have been hard at work planning, testing, and tweaking their unique approaches to financial stability. The Field gave them each $5,000 and a variety of professional development resources to support their planning. In late August 2009 the ERPA 7 applied to The Field for up to $25,000 in implementation funds to take their projects to the next level. STAY TUNED!! We will announce the recipients of the implementation grants in late September.

What is ERPA really? In 2008 (before the economy tanked), The Field received a generous award from The Rockefeller Foundation’s inaugural Cultural Innovation Fund to tackle the debilitating financial instability that many performing artists face every day. True to The Field’s grass roots, we took this project directly to our artists and asked them “what would you do?” This query resulted in two streams of attack: dynamic public dialogues (aka Invention Sessions), and an ambitious entrepreneurial lab (the ERPA 7). Since then, our Invention Sessions have engaged more than 500 artists and cultural stakeholders in topics ranging from alternative fundraising tactics, to the romanticization of the starving artist, to a smackdown exposé on the 'new' economy. (For full audio coverage of past Invention Sessions, please visit the ERPA Blog: EconomicRevitalization.blogspot.com). The Invention Session held at Joe’s Pub was also featured on WNYC Public Radio. As the economy continues its rocky road, The Field is committed to short- and long-term solutions and micro and macro efforts. We will continue to host Invention Sessions and skill-building programs that help artists revitalize their own economy. In the spring of 2010 we are also launching Economic Revitalization services in East Harlem and the Bronx with support from State Senator José Serrano.

About the ERPA 7

Kahlil Almustafa will bring performance poetry to his hometown of Jamaica, Queens. Through poetry workshops at high schools, performances at theaters, and Living Room Readings, Almustafa will promote poetry as a tool for community engagement. KahlilAlmustafa.com

Rachel Chavkin/The T.E.A.M. will launch American Geographic, an initiative designed to increase national visibility, annual work-weeks for its company members, and forge a country-wide network of audiences and supporters through direct engagement with communities around the nation. With American Geographic, the T.E.A.M. will re-envision itself as a year-round employer and therefore will seek to provide an essential year-round benefit - health insurance - to its part-time employees through corporate sponsorship. The T.E.A.M. hopes to develop a model of engagement between small arts companies and large corporations that will build a mutually beneficial bond between the business and arts community and enable future arts companies to pursue essential benefits for part-time employees. TheTEAMPlays.org

Nick Brooke composes collages of pop song fragments and sound effects, and then trains live performers to sound like these recordings, while creating intricate theatrical tableaus. He wants to use ERPA to create a ‘micro-commissioning’ program, in which small fragments, songs, or vignettes of a larger work are supported by smaller commissions. These microcommissions will be collaged on the web in an interactive installation, which will let participants converse with the artist, and see their works constantly change. NBrooke.com

Jon Stancato/Stolen Chair proposes a way to adapt the business plan followed by most Community Supported Agricultures (CSA). Like the CSA model, Stolen Chair hopes to build a membership community which would provide 'seed' money for the company's development process and then reap a year's worth of theatrical harvests. StolenChair.org

Connie Hall/Conni's Avant Garde Restaurant not only generates an abundance of comic material and great food, but also offers an alternative producing model for artist-driven theater. Through the ERPA program, the actor-run theater company will develop a sustainable business model using income generated by the sale of food and beverages to support its artistic work. AvantGardeRestaurant.com

JoAnna Mendl Shaw/The Equus Projects will develop their Regional Touring Program to include on-site coordinators in four regional hubs throughout the country, enabling each to advocate on the company's behalf and cultivate performance and workshop participation. This program will build upon The Equus Projects' strong national support base, cultivating effective leadership with a handful of key supporters. DancingWithHorses.org

Caroline Woolard/Our Goods proposes an online peer-to-peer network where creative people can trade objects, services, and space with each other. Check out the prototype at OurGoods.org. There you will find a work dress designed by Caroline waiting to be traded for your skills or artwork!

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

City money for who? for you?

My friends at Collective Arts Think Tank (CATT) published our 2nd post about NYC funding (Department of Cultural Affairs). It's concise and question-driven. We are hoping to speak with DCA in response.

I have another question to throw into the mix though:

The current multi-year funding process could benefit from some transparency so that the arts community can strive towards best practices in their applications for funding.

If you are a lucky recipient of multi-year funding from the DCA: your 1st year multi-year funding amount is announced and "contracted" at a certain $ level. (This is super and helps arts orgs plan for the future!)

But!

What happens the 2nd year? Multi-year $ is not set in stone alas. Your contracted amount can be cut or increased according to the rise and fall of the NYC budget. Last year and this year the warning that cuts were imminent was done well in advance so that you could plan (great!)

We got a tiny decrease last year and a bigger one this year. That's hard for us but I get it. I do. I just want to understand it so we can do better next year.

I called our kind Program Officer with these questions but got no real response except "there is no peer review of multi-years. We need to fill the gaps in the budget."

So who determines the cuts/increases? If not a peer-review process then it is ________? DCA staff, City Council, lobbyists? Is it across the board everyone gets cuts 2% or 8%? Nope. Some get big cuts, some small, some get increases!

Can we get feedback so we can do better in the future?

DCA is honorably committed to transparency and I love that. I'd love to see that transparency infiltrate the multi-year funding process as well so that grantees can endeavor to hit the highest marks possible.

On another note: look at what the odd city of Sacramento is doing for their arts community. Thanks Thomas Cott! It looks like Bloomberg is in for another round and with the anniversary of Lehman's demise and the crazy bonuses at Goldman (did I misunderstand??) maybe we can create a similar effort to support non-profits in this city who are still reeling from the crisis (and next year will only be worse for most of us??)